I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was acquiring a lot more tension and was slower compared to the outdated things. I don't recall if I even attempted frequent h4831 or not; I am contemplating not.

Of course, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of different ton figures, but I do think I understand why. It's a litigation-pushed environment, and a few fool would undoubtedly deduce that he could blend H380 and H110 and think of his have custom made combination of powder. What a world.

It's probably that no even further discussion is required, through which circumstance we recommend beginning a brand new thread. If having said that you really feel your reaction is necessary you could continue to accomplish that.

Warning working with SC or SSC designed loads with long Minimize, again off and do the job up. Use Protected loading approaches.

Yup or it won't perform properly. And Considering that the OP has a load utilizing Varget I'd try out to search out somebody to trade with. May well come up with a acquire acquire condition.

I have employed H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without any variation. The one thing could be the small Slice offers you a little more Area. Great luck!gun)

If there's no load data it can be because this powder just isn't suited to this cartridge. Ordinarily 1 will likely not find a single powder to fit all cartridges, plus the spouse and children of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you are asking about does not perform.

If you've some heavier .224" bullets, you might find a load that works OK Using the 4831. The bullets I tried that were in excess of 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which had the normal 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the largest bullet that will stabilize, nevertheless it did that superbly. h4831 vs h4831sc It's a humorous-hunting bullet which has a rounded nose profile, but it shoots fantastic and kills effectively. Deer out to about one hundred fifty yards al went down immediately with rib-cage hits.

The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to take advantage of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon Intense powder.

It truly is funny how through the years loading numerous distinctive cartridges in a number of rifles which i have never attained acceptable conclusion outcomes with H-4831 or maybe the brief-Slice version.

If there is not any load data it really is for the reason that this powder just isn't suited to this cartridge. Generally one particular will not locate just one powder to suit all cartridges, and also the relatives of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you are h4831sc load data asking about isn't going to do the job. Click to broaden...

It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Identified a node and shot some groups. I shot h4831sc load data a .6 5 shot team currently. It is really a little bit slower than H1000, but shoots superior. Many thanks for the advice, It really is excellent to realize that I've received possibilities when one or another powder is dried up.

Both contain the Similar burn up rate, shorter Minimize comes in helpful Should you be at max fill and never at tension/velocity you want you will get more shortcut in a very situation.

The truth that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is specifically why you might be looking at higher velocities obtained with that powder, instead of Whatever you've witnessed While using the IMR things.